QUEBEC BYELECTION: Conservatives Missed Opportunity To Benefit From Bill 62

Bill 62 looms large over the result, and the Conservatives missed an opportunity to stand with the vast majority of Quebeckers on the issue of face-veiling.

With the Liberals taking a seat from the Conservatives in the Quebec byelection in Lac-Saint-Jean, (the Conservatives won big in Alberta) the Trudeau government has demonstrated that they still retain a strong base in Canada’s second largest province. Yet, it didn’t have to be that way.

Bill 62, the face-veiling ban loomed large over the race, and the way it was handled by the Conservatives represents a huge missed opportunity for them. As we know, the vast majority of Canadians support legislation like Bill 62, and it has massive support in Quebec (87%). Trudeau was weakly evasive on it, while Andrew Scheer didn’t seem to want to talk about it. Meanwhile, Jagmeet Singh said it was against human rights.

Had the Conservatives issued expressions of support for Bill 62, they would have done much better in the Quebec byelection and they could have used it as the launching point to weaken the Liberals in a provincial stronghold Trudeau can’t afford to lose. After all, Quebec is acting in support of the basic ideas behind the culture of the Western world, and the Conservatives should be willing to stand 100% behind those principles.

But for now, the Liberal strategy of running a strong local candidate, and using evasive messaging on Bill 62 seemed to work.

The NDP will also be asking itself some very tough questions. Jagmeet Singh seems willing to abandon many of his Quebec MPs by embracing an agenda in line with far left social justice warriors. However, while Quebec often embraces social democratic economic policies, they are far more willing to defend western cultural norms than the out-of-touch elites in the rest of Canada. By ignoring that fact, Singh is leaving his Quebec MPs with no political cover, and many of them will be questioning whether to even run again in 2019.

While it’s important not to read too much into the two byelections, there are a few key takeaways:

  • 2015 looks like the high-water mark for the Liberals in the West. After they made gains in 2015, some thought they would soon challenge the Conservatives, even in Alberta. But two years of high-taxes, big government, and policies that have killed billions of dollars in energy industry investment make it clear that the Liberals are on a downward trend in the West.
  • Jagmeet Singh is willing to sacrifice Quebec to gain seats in Ontario and Alberta. There were already questions about Jagmeet Singh’s appeal in Quebec, and his position on Bill 62 combined with the terrible byelection result (NDP vote down almost 17% points) will only deepened those questions. It seems Singh is willing to lose votes in Quebec in order to try and take votes from the Liberals in Ontario and BC.
  • The Conservative base is rock-solid, but they still face big challenges. The huge win in Alberta, and their ability to maintain a decent amount of their vote in Quebec shows that their base remains solid. Yet, the huge shift from the NDP to the Liberals in Quebec is exactly what the Trudeau government is counting on to win a second majority. To stop that from happening on a larger scale in 2019, the Conservatives will need to get tough – embracing policies like Bill 62 in Quebec, and deepening their support with working class Canadians. Otherwise, the Conservatives could win 35% of the vote in the 2019 and still lose to Trudeau if the NDP remains weak and the Liberals hold much of their base.

Spencer Fernando

Photo – Google Maps

You can support by becoming a monthly contributor through Patreon, or making a contribution through PayPal.
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
jack grandville

Putting aside all the standard complaints about this bill, the reality is that when dressed in any manner that prevents those ‘public servants’ who have every right to do their jobs face-to-face with applicants for publicly paid benefits because, as we all know (or should know by now) that type of covering is ideal for any terrorist to go about their merry way concealing a conglomeration of potential weapons of destruction and, even if that is not the case, there can easily be envisioned an instance wherein police are acting in response to a terrorist act and, if they see… Read more »

don morris

To many of us who supported the CPC in past elections, Andrew Scheer is so far Liberal-Lite,going along with Trudeau on Climate Change and Bill-C-62. The CPC ‘s attitude seems to be that we owe them our loyalty, but given that they are supposed to be working for US,the taxpayers, they had better develop a platform quickly to satisfy US, their supporters,or they will be once again on the outside looking in come 2019. Trudeau is the incumbent,he still has a loyal following and the media still loves him, so the cards are stacked in his favor. Scheer and the… Read more »


I am very disappointed in the PC s for voting against this bill.


Sheer being weak. Sheer embracing Conservative failure. I too am so disappointed! Sheer is actively not campaigning to be the opposition forever. Next he will race to out left the left…………….

Miles Lunn

I believe supporting Bill 62 would be a big mistake as while it may help them in Quebec, Tories don’t have exactly a good history of winning seats in Quebec, especially when the leader is not a native son. It is the 905 belt and Lower Mainland suburbs they need to win back and supporting this won’t help there. What the Tories really need is the BQ to step up the game as they too likely support Bill 62 and even stronger one and they seem the party most likely to take out the Liberals in Quebec, that being said… Read more »