Our country risks alienating the law-abiding gun owners Canada needs to form the core of individuals who could – rapidly and at scale – train hundreds of thousands of Canadians in firearm usage. This is counterproductive.
As Canada continues to face escalating threats to the survival of our nation, our country must become more resilient – and fast. One of the most important ways to do this is to create a large group of citizens – at least a few hundred thousand strong – who are trained in firearms use. Not an offensive force since Canada respects the territorial integrity of other nations, but a defensive force, sending a clear message to anyone who would consider taking our territory that any such move would come at an immense cost in lives.
That’s why, while the Canadian Armed Forces should focus on embracing technology, improving domestic procurement, high-quality equipment, mass production of drones, and closer cooperation with the U.K., Europe, South Korea, and Japan, we also need a large civil defence force.
Why the gun buyback is counterproductive
With this in mind, we must form a core group of citizens who can help lead and train this civil defence force. And that core group will be drawn from Canadian Veterans and law-abiding Canadian firearm owners. Unfortunately, some in that group are being alienated by the federal gun buyback program, a program that has been rejected by many provinces, some police forces, and which appears to be incredibly inefficient.
This is deeply counterproductive. At a time when Canada needs to utilize the skills and knowledge of law-abiding gun owners, the government risks pushing that group away. This needs to change, and it needs to change fast. The Canadian government should scrap the gun buyback program, and remember that Canada’s law-abiding gun owners are an asset to our nation.
Spencer Fernando
If you would like to support my work, you can contribute through PayPal at the button below:
Alternatively, if you would like to support my work on an ongoing basis and gain access to exclusive content, you can subscribe for $6 a month or $72 a year.
Subscribe here.
I am 100% Independent. I don't take government media subsidies, and I never will. My work is funded entirely by readers — no grants, no strings, no obligations to anyone but you.
If you find value in my independent perspective, consider making a donation:
If you want to support my work on a monthly basis and access all of my long-form writing, you can subscribe to my Patreon for $20/month or $216/year.