Following Nightmare Interview, Prince Andrew’s Business Support Flees

Time for Canada to distance ourselves from him as well.

Following his nightmare BBC Newsnight interview, Prince Andrew’s business support is fleeing.

The prince, already a toxic figure for his association with Jeffrey Epstein, became even more toxic, as the interview made the prince seem dishonest and evasive.

In particular, his claims that he ‘couldn’t sweat’ and rarely partied were immediately destroyed by multiple images showing him partying and sweating profusely.

He also blinked repeatedly when asked certain questions, often a sign of dishonesty.

Now, as reported by BNN Bloomberg, business groups that once supported Andrew are heading for the hills:

“Britain’s Prince Andrew is facing further disgrace as charitable backers begin to distance themselves from him amid unfavourable fallout of an interview on his friendship with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Britain’s Press Association is reporting that professional services provider KPMG, a sponsor of his flagship entrepreneur project, Pitch↕Palace, won’t renew its support. Pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca, another backer of the project, says it is reviewing its three-year partnership, which is due to expire at the end of the year.”

With others distancing themselves from Andrew, it’s time for Canada to do the same.

A first step would be for Canada to revoke Andrew’s rank in the Canadian armed forces, and remove him from any connection to the Canadian military whatsoever.

Spencer Fernando

Photo – YouTube

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
NancyW

Yes we should and with the Clinton also involved among others.

shawn harris

I disagree with Spencer, that Canada should cut ties with Prince andrew and the monarchy. For if we do that then Canada should have dumped the monarchy anytime after confederation, since there hasn’t been a time when some royal hasn’t made some very bad mistakes and shown poor judgement in friendships. After all, through marriage most of the senior current royals, including the Queen, are directly related back to the German monarchy. Which according to Spencer Fernando’s logic, we should not have supported Britain and the royal family during WW2, because the British royal family was connected to the Third… Read more »

Del

Are you being sarcastic? Where in Spencer’s article did he state Canada should cut ties with the Monarchy? Why do “you people” and the Canadian Media always interpret things the way you want to see them and then crap on that perverted interpretation? You probably thought Cherry was referring to Trudeau’s illegal migrants. What does someone who parties with a convicted sexual pervert have to do with the Third Reich? Wow.

Frances

There is no excuse for Prince Andrew’s behaviour, but I would very much like to know who is orchestrating this pile-on. Surely there are other prominent men who spent as much time as or more than the prince at Epstein’s various brothels. Also, why has Guislaine Maxwell been allowed to go underground.

Clive Edwards

It is a moral weakness if one accepts the sexual availability of someone who finds your fame attractive. It is a criminal offence if that sexually available person is below the age of consent. Canada has fired both military leaders and political leaders for moral failings.