Goalposts moved yet again.
As I regularly mention, the global elites continually use a ‘move-the-goalposts’ strategy to take more control over our lives.
They tell everyone that this ‘one thing’ is necessary to ‘save the planet.’
Then, once people start implementing ‘that one thing,’ there’s a new ‘thing’ that is necessary to ‘save the planet.’
Then, it shifts again. That ‘thing’ isn’t enough, so here’s the ‘new thing’ that’s necessary to ‘save the planet.’
And on and on it goes, as more of our democracy, freedom, and money is taken and transferred to global institutions controlled by the elites, and over which regular citizens have no influence or control.
Now, it’s happening again, and this time it’s the UN telling people what to eat.
Here’s part of an AP report:
“The cycle is accelerating,” said NASA climate scientist Cynthia Rosenzweig, a co-author of the report. “The threat of climate change affecting people’s food on their dinner table is increasing.”
But if people change the way they eat, grow food and manage forests, it could help save the planet from a far warmer future, scientists said.”
“If people change their diets, reducing red meat and increasing plant-based foods, such as fruits, vegetables and seeds, the world can save as much as another 15% of current emissions by mid-century. It would also make people more healthy, Rosenzweig said.”
“The science panel said they aren’t telling people what to eat because that’s a personal choice.”
Additionally, “Still, Hans-Otto Pörtner, a panel leader from Germany who said he lost weight and felt better after reducing his meat consumption, told a reporter that if she ate less ribs and more vegetables “that’s a good decision and you will help the planet reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”
Of course, the UN Panel only threw that line about not “telling people what to eat” as an attempt to pretend that’s not what they’re doing, even though that’s exactly what they’re doing.
That’s how the UN elites and the elites in Canada operate. First, a report is released with a ‘suggestion,’ then that suggestion becomes ‘necessary to save the world,’ then it turns into a ‘policy idea,’ then everyone who opposes that idea is branded a ‘denier’ and is demonized.
As I said on Twitter, even though none of this UN stuff really applies to Canada, we can expect Liberal politicians to try and use it here at home:
“Canada has a gigantic amount of land, and an immense abundance of food. Yet, expect Liberal politicians to read the latest BS UN ‘climate change’ report and demand ‘changes’ in Canada that screws over our meat industry and hurts taxpayers. Carbon tax 2.0…”