U.S. Supreme Court strikes down Trump tariffs

In 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not give the U.S. President the authority to impose wide-ranging tariffs.

In a massive blow to U.S. President Donald Trump’s economic agenda, the United States Supreme Court has ruled 6-3 that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) – which does not mention tariffs – does not give the U.S. President the power to impose tariffs. That had been the centrepiece of Trump’s economic agenda, and he used his supposed wide-ranging tariff authority to coerce and threaten other nations. Of note, other tariffs – including steel and aluminum tariffs – were imposed under different auspices – and are not impacted by the ruling.

Trump has threatened tariffs for a myriad of reasons, including speeches he doesn’t like, phone conversations, social media posts, TV ads, and countless others ‘justifications.’ Trump’s ability to use tariffs without congressional approval – and thus threaten tariffs on a whim – was built on the idea that the IEEPA gave Trump nearly unchecked tariff powers. Now, those powers have been struck down, and with it, a key aspect of Trump’s leverage over other nations.

While the Trump Administration has said it will try to rebuild the tariffs using other means, that process will be much more difficult than the broad invocation of the IEEPA, and the Supreme Court rebuke is a sign of growing pushback to Trump’s authoritarian agenda.

Spencer Fernando


If you would like to support my work in defence of the truth and a strong and sovereign Canada, please consider making a contribution through PayPal at the button below:


Alternatively, if you would like to support my pro-Canada perspective on an ongoing basis and gain access to exclusive content, you can subscribe for $6 a month or $72 a year.

Subscribe here.

If this piece left you clearer than it found you, that's the point. I write for readers who want to think past the week, to see the longer pattern beneath the daily story, and to come away steadier rather than more agitated.

That longer view gets built somewhere. On Patreon, essay by essay, I'm constructing The Long Work, a body of analysis meant to outlast the news cycle that prompted it. The readers there make it possible. No subsidies, no strings. The work answers to them.

$8/month to read it as it's built, and to have a hand in building it.

Share Your Thoughts