What a fool.
During his press conference responding to Jody Wilson-Raybould’s testimony, Justin Trudeau said he was “definitely not in agreement,” with what she said.
Later though, he said he hadn’t had the chance to ‘review’ her testimony.
So, how could he disagree with something he hadn’t read?
Clearly, Justin Trudeau and his cronies know that they have to ‘disagree’ with what she said, because agreeing with it would require them to submit their resignations immediately and admit to having a totally corrupt mindset.
That means they decided on their talking points ahead of time, which left them in the hilarious position of opposing Jody Wilson-Raybould’s note-based testimony with empty platitudes.
Wilson-Raybould has notes of what happened. She has conversations, she has a timeline.
Trudeau?
He has ‘disagreement’ despite not reading it.
It’s a pathetic display from Trudeau, who is trying to pretend that his government isn’t in chaos and total crisis. He has been exposed as a fake and a fraud, and no amount of empty talking points will restore his false image.
Spencer Fernando
Photo – YouTube
*****
