As Russia escalates, American ambiguity grows more dangerous.
U.S. President Donald Trump effectively utilizes aggressive rhetoric to project an aura of strength. However, that’s where his effectiveness appears to end.
Take the recent trade war he launched. Trump pledged to ‘liberate’ the American economy and imposed high tariffs on nearly the entire world. There was little consideration of what would happen after the announcement, and a broad reversal soon followed.
Tariffs as high as 145% on Chinese imports have already been partially reversed, with more reversals likely.
Repeatedly, Trump overpromises and underdelivers.
This pattern of impulsive escalation followed by retreat is not limited to economics. In foreign policy, especially in Ukraine, the same dynamic is playing out with greater human cost.
Simplistic Rhetoric Meets Real-World Complexity
During the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election, Donald Trump promised to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours. He repeatedly claimed the war wouldn’t have occurred if he had been President in 2022. And he promised “peace through strength.”
This simplistic rhetoric has collided with the complexities of geopolitical reality. Yet, as with his tariff war, there is little evidence that Trump’s rhetoric is supported by any detailed planning.
The Trump Administration proposed a 30-day ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia as a first step towards a broader peace agreement. Ukraine accepted the proposal on March 11th. Russia has not. And today, on Palm Sunday, Russia launched an escalatory attack on the Ukrainian City of Sumy that killed dozens of civilians and wounded scores more. Here’s what Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said following the Russian attack:
“As of now, 31 people are known to have been killed in Sumy by the Russian ballistic missile strike. Among those killed were two children. My condolences to the families and loved ones… More than 84 people have been wounded, including 10 children. All of them are receiving the necessary assistance.
It is crucial that the world does not stay silent or indifferent. Russian strikes deserve nothing but condemnation. There must be pressure on Russia to end the war and guarantee security for people. Without truly strong pressure, without sufficient support for Ukraine, Russia will continue dragging this war out.
It’s now the second month that Putin has been ignoring the U.S. proposal for a full and unconditional ceasefire. Unfortunately, there in Moscow they are convinced they can keep killing with impunity. Action is needed to change this situation.”
Russia is calling Donald Trump’s bluff — betting he has neither a plan nor the will to act. So far, Russia is winning that bet. While countless world leaders – including Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney – issued official statements denouncing Russia’s attack on Ukrainian civilians shortly after the attack became known, the U.S. President did not. He only responded many hours later when asked about the strike while on Air Force One, and claimed, “I think it was terrible, and I was told they made a mistake.” This continues Trump’s pattern of downplaying Russian acts of aggression.
A Moment for Responsible Leadership
American ambiguity is emboldening Russia, which raises the risks not only for Ukraine but for Europe and Canada. Russia continues to take an aggressive posture in both the Arctic and Eastern Europe, and the Russian war economy continues to churn out weapons. With the U.S. appearing unwilling to counter this trend, responsible nations have an opportunity to step up.
Canada, along with our NATO allies and partners such as Japan and Australia, should ramp up military investment and pool our financial resources to provide more air defence systems and artillery shells to Ukraine. It is important to ensure Ukraine has what it takes to defend its cities and territory, and the more well-equipped Ukraine is now, the more leverage it will ultimately have when peace negotiations commence.
In the absence of U.S. resolve, allied democracies must fill the void, not just in words, but in weapons.
Spencer Fernando
Photo – Twitter
If this piece left you clearer than it found you, that's the point. I write for readers who want to think past the week, to see the longer pattern beneath the daily story, and to come away steadier rather than more agitated.
That longer view gets built somewhere. On Patreon, essay by essay, I'm constructing The Long Work, a body of analysis meant to outlast the news cycle that prompted it. The readers there make it possible. No subsidies, no strings. The work answers to them.
$8/month to read it as it's built, and to have a hand in building it.